Search this site

Delegated billing can save time for a small clinical practice. It can also create a blind spot if the provider receives only an appointment summary or a flat payment and never sees what was actually filed with the insurer. A complete claim audit trail should connect the date of service, patient and insured identifiers, treating clinician, location, diagnosis and procedure codes, modifiers, charge, payer adjustments, denied or allowed amounts, and final payment. Those elements serve different purposes. The clinician knows what care was performed; the biller knows what was transmitted; the payer knows what it adjudicated. Some network intermediaries pay a case rate or invoice amount irrespective of the insurer's final payment. That compensation model alone does not prove fraud or improper billing. The challenge arises when the treating clinician cannot check whether the transmitted claim accurately reflects the professional service or when a mistake cannot be corrected in time. Before agreeing to a delegated arrangement, clinicians should ask whether they can obtain the 837P submission or equivalent claim image, explanations of benefits or remittance advice, correction history, adjustment reasons, payer correspondence, and a clear procedure for reporting errors. Access must be implemented consistently with privacy and security requirements. A provider portal displaying only an internal invoice is not necessarily a substitute for the insurer's claim. Likewise, an EOB showing one organization's name cannot tell a reviewer everything about the rendering-provider field. These records should be compared, not conflated. The payer has an oversight role too. When an insurer delegates significant network or claims work, it should be able to establish who is furnishing care, how providers are enrolled, who is authorized to submit and receive reimbursement, and what safeguards detect inaccurate identities or codes. The ultimate principle is accountability. Outsourcing claims processing should not make accurate records impossible for the professional whose care generated the claim. Practices can negotiate or request specific audit and correction rights before signing.

The Challenge of Secondary Insurance A patient finds a lactation practice advertised as “in network with Cigna through Wildflower.” She has Cigna coverage and expects to use that benefit. However, she soon discloses that Cigna is her secondary insurance. Unfortunately, Wildflower will not allow the patient to be entered into its system when Cigna is not the primary payer. The actual practice does not have a direct Cigna contract. If the practice bills Cigna independently, its claim is treated as out of network. The clinician has not changed. The service has not changed. But the patient cannot access the network arrangement because another insurer pays first. This situation can leave families paying for care that their secondary coverage might otherwise help cover. Cigna’s Published Guidance on Secondary Insurance Cigna’s lactation guidance, updated July 31, 2025, states that its designated network provides the preventive service at 100% without cost sharing. It also expressly states: “Coordination of benefits will apply if Cigna Healthcare is not the primary payer.” This acknowledgment indicates that patients may have secondary Cigna coverage. Yet, the Wildflower intake restriction described here stops those patients before a visit can be submitted through the arrangement. This is not a secondary claim being reviewed and properly resulting in no additional payment. The patient cannot enter the designated pathway at all. When Primary Insurance Pays but Leaves a Balance Consider a practice that participates with the patient’s primary Aetna or UnitedHealthcare plan. The primary claim processes in network. Depending on the particular benefit and service, it may leave a deductible, copay, or coinsurance. The practice then needs to submit the corresponding secondary claim to Cigna. But Wildflower will not accept the patient because Cigna is secondary, and the practice has no direct Cigna contract. The secondary claim therefore receives out-of-network consideration when submitted directly—even though the patient was told the practice was in network through Wildflower. Secondary coverage does not guarantee that Cigna will pay the remaining balance. Its coordination rules still apply. The harm is that the patient loses access to in-network secondary consideration before those rules can be applied through the promised network pathway. When Primary Insurance Does Not Cover the Office Visit The consequences can be especially serious for patients whose particular BCBS plans cover lactation through a hospital but do not cover the independent outpatient service they need. The primary claim may produce no payment. Secondary coverage could be crucial in filling that gap. But Wildflower excludes the patient because Cigna is secondary. The independent practice cannot submit directly as a participating Cigna provider. Depending on its relationship with the primary insurer, the practice may be out of network with one or both plans. Either way, the patient’s access to Cigna’s in-network lactation benefit has disappeared. Having two insurance cards does not help when the billing structure blocks the benefit the patient needs. Billing the Primary Through Wildflower Does Not Solve This Wildflower’s Cigna arrangement does not establish participation or claim-submission eligibility with the patient’s other insurer. Each payer has its own requirements for provider registration, billing and rendering identities, credentialing, and group affiliation. UnitedHealthcare, for example, publishes requirements for billing and rendering NPIs and a process for adding clinicians to group contracts. uhcprovider.com The actual practice’s relationships with other insurers cannot simply be transferred to Wildflower. Nor can Wildflower’s Cigna network status simply be transferred to a secondary claim submitted under the practice’s own information. Providers cannot fix this by changing accurate claim information to fit incompatible billing arrangements. This Raises an ACA Compliance Concern The ACA’s preventive-services requirements generally apply to non-grandfathered comprehensive health plans. HRSA’s covered preventive guidelines include comprehensive lactation support. ecfr.gov, hrsa.gov Federal rules also require coverage without cost sharing through an out-of-network provider when the plan has no network provider who can provide the required preventive service. Federal agencies specifically explain that protection for lactation counseling in ACA FAQs Part XXIX, Question 2. dol.gov Whether Wildflower’s intake exclusion violates those requirements is a legal determination. But the concern is concrete: does Cigna provide an accessible covered pathway for the patient, or merely advertise one that excludes her insurance situation? Listing another company or sending the family back to Wildflower does not establish that an appropriate provider can deliver the needed care and coordinate the coverage. Cigna Needs to Fix the Structure The individual clinician did not create this problem. The practice cannot grant itself a direct Cigna contract or override Wildflower’s intake restrictions. Cigna needs to allow practices to participate and bill using their own accurate office and rendering-provider information, so their primary and secondary claims can follow a consistent, supported process. If Cigna maintains another arrangement instead, it remains responsible for ensuring that patients have a functioning pathway to the applicable benefit. “In network through Wildflower” should not become unusable the moment Cigna is secondary. Patients need coverage that works with the insurance they actually have—not coverage that disappears at intake. Conclusion: A Call for Change In conclusion, the current structure creates barriers for patients seeking lactation support. It is essential for Cigna to address these issues. By allowing practices to bill accurately and ensuring that patients can access their benefits regardless of their insurance situation, we can create a more equitable healthcare environment. I hope that by sharing this information, we can raise awareness and encourage changes that benefit families in need of lactation services. Together, we can work towards a system that truly supports patients and their healthcare journeys.

When following an insurer’s billing rules no longer produces enough reimbursement to cover the care provided, it is time to reconsider the contract. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee has announced new lactation claim restrictions effective January 1, 2027. For IBCLC practices already experiencing infant claim recoupments and restrictions on maternal billing, these changes raise a serious question: is continued in-network participation financially sustainable? Providers should answer that question using BCBST’s stated rules and their actual reimbursement—not promises that another company can somehow bill around the restrictions. What BCBST has announced Beginning January 1, 2027, BCBST will deny 99401–99404 submitted by lactation providers for patients ages 0 through 8. Its notice directs providers to bill preventive counseling once under the lactating member’s policy when mother and baby participate. It also states that these preventive counseling codes should not be used for evaluation or treatment of an existing breastfeeding or lactation condition. The notice does not identify a replacement reimbursement pathway for an IBCLC’s separate infant services. What those changes mean in practice In Sunshyn’s billing experience, BCBST has already been recouping infant S9443 payments. Codes 99401–99404 were the remaining paid pathway for infant lactation services. We have also encountered restrictions against billing 9940x and S9443 together on the mother’s claim. Together, these restrictions leave practices facing: Recoupments of infant S9443 payments. Denials of infant 99401–99404 beginning January 1, 2027. Limits on combining lactation codes on the mother’s claim. Although the notice does not call this a blanket exclusion of infant lactation care, the practical effect for an IBCLC without another authorized, payable pathway is the loss of infant reimbursement. Directing the provider to bill the mother does not replace payment for the infant’s separate care. The infant’s care does not disappear A mother–baby appointment can involve two patients with distinct needs. Assessing the infant’s feeding, documenting findings, developing a care plan and coordinating appropriate referrals takes professional time. Restricting reimbursement does not eliminate that work. For a practice whose remaining payment cannot cover the visit, continued participation means absorbing the difference. Providers’ commitment to families should not be treated as an unlimited subsidy for an insurer’s benefit. “We have a special contract” needs proof Providers should refrain from signing a third-party agreement based on promises of better payment outside BCBST’s stated rules. A company may claim it has a special contract. It may propose billing under an NP or physician, or adding nutrition or dietitian codes. None of those explanations, by itself, establishes that the proposed billing is authorized. Billing an IBCLC’s work under an NP or physician does not automatically make it that professional’s service. Adding nutrition codes does not establish that a separately billable nutrition service occurred or that the rendering provider meets the applicable requirements. Any arrangement must satisfy the actual payer contract and applicable provider, supervision, documentation and coding requirements. If a third party claims an exception, require written confirmation from BCBST that it applies to your credentials, your services and the proposed billing arrangement. Ask to see how your work will appear on claims and who bears responsibility for recoupments. A paid claim is not proof of an authorized exception. Neither is a salesperson’s assurance. Follow the rules—and let the payment gap be visible Providers should bill accurately for the services actually performed. They should not change the patient, professional identity, diagnosis or service description simply to obtain payment. Our position at Sunshyn is that reliance on workarounds and opaque third-party arrangements has helped sustain an inadequate reimbursement model. When providers continually find another billing route, the true cost of delivering care—and the inadequacy of the underlying payment—can remain hidden. That is our assessment of the problem, not a claim that BCBST has publicly identified those arrangements as the cause of this policy. The way forward is to make the reimbursement gap visible and hold the payer accountable for explaining how its benefit supports access to care. Review whether your BCBST contract belongs in your 2027 practice If BCBST’s authorized reimbursement does not cover the cost of compliant care, our recommendation is to independently evaluate terminating your participation for 2027. Review actual collections, recoupments, documentation time, billing expenses and patient-care costs. Base the decision on what your practice can legitimately collect and retain. If termination is appropriate, check your contract’s notice requirements promptly. A January 2027 effective date will depend on those requirements and any applicable patient-transition obligations. Each practice must make its own participation decision. There is no obligation to keep an economically unsustainable contract simply because someone promises another workaround. Families need sustainable access to lactation care An in-network listing does not ensure meaningful access when providers cannot afford to deliver the service. BCBST has published its restrictions. Providers should take them seriously. Third parties claiming a different payment pathway must substantiate it with applicable payer authorization. IBCLCs deserve clear contracts and reimbursement that supports the care they provide. Families deserve an insurance benefit that makes that care accessible. Neither should have to depend on billing the work as something else. Source: BCBST Updated Code Edits, effective January 1, 2027. The S9443 recoupments and restrictions on combining maternal codes described here reflect Sunshyn’s billing experience and are separate from the changes expressly stated in the linked notice. Support for independent lactation practices Explore Sunshyn’s lactation and IBCLC billing support, medical billing services, and credentialing and payer enrollment services. For education and practice resources, visit the Sunshyn Learning Center.

A family conversation is not automatically a separate service Occupational therapists routinely teach family members how to support a patient's daily activities. Sometimes that teaching is part of the patient's treatment. Sometimes the caregiver needs a separate training session. The billing decision should follow the work, not the fact that a relative attended. Medicare describes caregiver training that can occur without the patient present when it is appropriate to the treatment plan. The training must support the patient's health and treatment goals, and the patient must need the caregiver's help for treatment to succeed. Occupational therapists are among the listed providers. [1] Describe what the caregiver needed to learn A note that says caregiver educated does not explain the clinical purpose. Identify the task, the difficulty the caregiver encountered, and the skilled instruction you provided. For example, a session may address how to assist a patient with dressing while managing specific functional limitations. Record how the caregiver practiced and what still required correction. Keep the patient as the focus of the treatment plan. The caregiver's attendance does not turn the appointment into treatment of the caregiver's own condition. It also does not make general discussion about family stress an OT caregiver-training service. Before billing, review the exact code requirements, including patient presence or absence and consent. For Medicare, CMS states that 97550 and 97551 require the full initial 30 minutes and additional 15 minutes respectively; the usual therapy midpoint shortcut does not apply. [2] Do not count the same work and minutes again under another service. Discuss the financial side too Medicare's public guidance states that Part B deductible and coinsurance generally apply to covered caregiver training. Explain potential patient responsibility rather than describing a training benefit as automatically free. [1] For other plans, confirm whether the particular service is covered, whether your practice may bill it, and whether authorization is required. A Medicare benefit does not amend a commercial contract. A separate caregiver session should solve a specific problem in carrying out the patient's plan. When the purpose, documentation, and billing requirements line up, the practice can explain exactly what the session accomplished. Sources [1] Medicare caregiver training coverage [2] CMS therapy services spotlight archive Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s occupational therapy practice support and medical billing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

Look at the work rather than the appointment label A patient comes in for IUD insertion. The clinician reviews the plan, answers routine procedural questions, and performs the insertion. The fact that the clinician spoke with the patient does not automatically establish a separately billable evaluation and management service. ACOG's coding guidance explains that reporting an E/M service with a procedure requires a significant, separately identifiable E/M service. Modifier 25 identifies that distinction when appropriately appended to the E/M code. It does not create additional work that the record does not show. [1] Document a separate evaluation when it occurs There may be a distinct clinical concern requiring evaluation at the same encounter. Document the history and assessment relevant to that concern, the medical decision making, and the plan. The record should let a reviewer distinguish the additional evaluation from the work associated with the procedure. Do not automatically add an office visit because this is the patient's first appointment with the practice. New-patient status and a separately reportable service are different questions. Likewise, avoid a blanket policy that an office visit can never be reported when an insertion occurs. Review the actual work. When choosing an E/M level by time, keep time devoted to a separately reported procedure out of the E/M total. AMA guidance excludes separately reported services from E/M time. Use the current coding instructions and payer requirements rather than treating the entire appointment duration as office-visit time. [2] Tell patients what may be separate Benefit checks should address the device, insertion, and any anticipated separate evaluation. Do not promise that every service at a contraceptive appointment will have identical cost sharing. Conversely, do not tell patients a separate charge is inevitable when the clinical work has not happened. Review denials against the documentation and applicable edits before repeatedly adding modifiers. A corrected claim should correct an actual error, not attempt to force payment. The aim is a claim that reflects what happened: the procedure alone when that is the supported service, or the procedure and a genuinely separate evaluation when both are justified. Sources [1] ACOG E M services and procedure coding guidance [2] AMA outpatient visit time documentation guidance Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s maternal health practice support and medical billing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

A vaccine record does not explain the whole claim A pediatric chart can list every vaccine correctly and still leave the administration claim unsupported. The practice also needs to know who provided counseling and when it occurred. A handout and a checked box do not answer those questions. AAP guidance distinguishes administration coding when a physician or other qualified professional provides counseling on the administration date from coding when clinical staff provide it or the counseling occurred on another date. It also distinguishes counting vaccine components from counting injections. [1] Document the counseling that occurred For the applicable pediatric counseling and administration code family, verify the age requirement in the current code set. Identify the clinician who counseled, the vaccines discussed, and the questions or concerns addressed. AAP specifically notes that merely giving a vaccine information statement and a brief overview does not meet the counseling definition. [1] Do not assume that an earlier discussion supports the same code when the child returns on a different day for administration. Make the workflow capture the service delivered on the actual administration date. A combination vaccine is another common point of confusion. The number of syringes does not necessarily equal the number of components used for coding. Review the correct counting method for the selected code family instead of building one automatic unit rule for every vaccine claim. Keep the product and administration review connected Reconcile the documented product, administration date, and administration services before submission. Make sure a template has not carried forward counseling from an earlier appointment. Follow the payer's product and administration policies, including applicable publicly supplied vaccine requirements. Explain unexpected patient statements by reviewing the actual claim and benefit, not by assuming the family selected the wrong coverage. A paid vaccine product does not prove that every administration line was correctly billed. The practice should be able to trace the claim back to the product given and the counseling actually provided. That is more reliable than letting an immunization checkbox choose the billing automatically. Sources [1] AAP immunization frequently asked questions Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s pediatric practice support and medical billing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

Make the Medicare decision deliberately A marriage and family therapist may decide to operate a private-pay practice. For Medicare patients receiving otherwise covered services, however, a cash-only statement on the website does not establish a valid Medicare opt-out. MFTs became eligible to bill Medicare independently for qualifying services effective January 1, 2024. CMS and its contractor guidance also recognize an opt-out pathway for eligible MFTs. Enrollment and opting out are different processes. [1, 2] Use the required process CMS describes opting out as requiring an affidavit and private contracts with Medicare patients. Its guidance warns that a practitioner cannot opt out selectively for certain Medicare patients or services while keeping ordinary Medicare billing for others. Emergency and urgent care involve additional rules. [2] A generic financial consent or a statement that the practice does not accept insurance should not be treated as a substitute. Before seeing Medicare patients on a private-contract basis, confirm the required terms, filing process, and effective date with the Medicare Administrative Contractor. The decision also needs to reach scheduling and billing. Staff should know what to tell a prospective patient, which paperwork applies, and why a superbill cannot be presented as a route to Medicare payment for privately contracted services. Plan for changes in the practice If an MFT joins a group, leaves a group, or changes business arrangements, review the individual's Medicare status before promising insurance billing. A new business name should not be assumed to cancel an existing opt-out. CMS's MFT guidance describes a two-year opt-out period with automatic renewal unless the practitioner timely terminates it. Put the relevant dates on an administrative calendar instead of relying on memory. [3] Private-pay care can be a considered practice choice. The problem is treating non-enrollment, out-of-network status, and formal Medicare opt-out as if they all mean the same thing. They do not. Sources [1] CMS MFT and MHC benefit information [2] CMS managing enrollment and opting out [3] CMS MFT and MHC frequently asked questions Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s marriage and family therapy practice support and insurance credentialing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

Coverage on the schedule is not a billing exception An independent practice needs temporary clinical coverage. The regular clinician is away, patients still need appointments, and a nurse practitioner is available. Calling the arrangement locum tenens does not settle whose NPI belongs on the claim. Medicare's fee-for-time compensation rules allow specific substitution arrangements. Noridian expressly states that services of nonphysician practitioners, including NPs, may not be billed under those fee-for-time or reciprocal billing reassignment exceptions. Its guidance also describes a limited physical therapist exception. This is not a general permission for any covering clinician to use someone else's NPI. [1] Set up the coverage before patients arrive Check the temporary NP's individual enrollment, group relationship where applicable, and eligibility for the actual payer and service location. Ask the payer how it handles temporary NPs rather than assuming a physician substitution policy includes them. Document who examined the patient, who made the decisions, and who completed the service. A staffing agency's contract can establish a business relationship, but it does not rewrite the insurer's claim requirements. If the NP is not ready to bill, changing the rendering identity is not an administrative shortcut. Resolve the enrollment or contracting issue and develop a lawful coverage plan before the practice promises patients in-network appointments. Keep other billing pathways separate Do not confuse substitution with incident-to billing. They are different concepts with different requirements. A physician being somewhere in the organization does not establish that an NP's visit qualifies for another billing pathway. Commercial contracts may address temporary coverage differently from Medicare. Obtain the applicable written policy and keep the response with the coverage plan. A representative's general assurance that the practice is in network does not answer whether the covering NP is properly included. Temporary staffing should preserve patient access without making the claim describe a clinician who did not provide the service under the rules being used. Sources [1] Noridian fee for time compensation and reciprocal billing guidance Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s nurse practitioner practice support and insurance credentialing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

A plateau should trigger a clinical review The patient has stopped making measurable gains. That observation matters, but it does not answer every coverage question. For Medicare outpatient therapy, lack of improvement alone is not the standard for ending coverage. CMS explains that skilled therapy may be covered to maintain a patient's condition or prevent or slow deterioration when the patient needs a qualified therapist's skills. Other coverage requirements still apply. This is an existing Medicare standard clarified through the Jimmo settlement, not a new unlimited therapy benefit. [1] Explain why the therapist is still needed Maintenance documentation needs more than the word maintenance. Describe the functional risk, what skilled judgment the therapist must use, and why the patient or an appropriately trained caregiver cannot safely and effectively carry out the needed services alone. CMS specifically distinguishes skilled maintenance care from activities that do not require a qualified therapist. [1] In pelvic health, do not assume either automatic coverage or automatic exclusion. Evaluate the individual condition and functional needs. If the patient's program can now be performed independently, explain the transition. If clinical complexity still requires skilled management, document that complexity and the work performed rather than repeating goals that no longer fit. A recommendation to keep attending because it helps is not the same as an explanation of why skilled PT remains necessary. Update the plan rather than the story When the treatment goal changes from improvement to maintaining function, revise the plan to reflect the actual goal. Do not continue documenting improvement that did not occur merely because the template expects it. Review frequency and the need for continued skilled involvement as the patient's situation changes. For a commercial plan, read its maintenance provisions and applicable requirements separately. Do not present a Medicare clarification as a guarantee that every plan pays for every maintenance visit. The right question is not simply whether the patient improved this week. It is whether the documented care still requires a therapist and meets the benefit's conditions. Sources [1] CMS Jimmo settlement frequently asked questions Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s physical therapy practice support and medical billing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

Simple testing still has requirements A midwifery practice may view a urine or pregnancy test as a small part of an appointment. The test may be simple, but the office still needs to determine whether its testing falls under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments requirements. CMS's March 2026 CLIA guidance explains that laboratory requirements reach office testing and are not limited to laboratories submitting Medicare claims. A certificate of waiver permits testing categorized as waived; waived does not mean exempt from the program. [1] Review the exact test system Before adding a test, identify the manufacturer and exact system, verify its classification, and confirm that the practice holds the appropriate certificate. Do not assume all versions of a test have the same classification because they measure the same thing. CMS states that laboratories performing only waived testing must enroll, pay applicable certificate fees, and follow the manufacturer's instructions. State requirements also need review. [1] Assign responsibility for the operational details: staff training, supplies, expiration checks, result documentation, and follow-up. These are practice procedures worth checking before the first patient is tested, not after a claim rejects. A clinician's midwifery credential does not itself establish the business's laboratory certification. Separate permission to test from payment Once the testing setup is correct, review the billing requirements independently. Confirm the appropriate code, whether a modifier or laboratory identifier is required for that test and payer, and whether the service is separately payable. The existence of a CLIA certificate does not guarantee reimbursement. Describe midwifery credentials accurately throughout the process. Certified nurse-midwives, certified midwives, and other state-recognized midwifery credentials are not interchangeable descriptions of licensure or payer eligibility. Check the rules that apply to the individual and the location. Patients should receive results with a clear explanation of who reviews them and what happens next. A small office test still needs a complete clinical and administrative process. Sources [1] CMS CLIA Program and Medicare Laboratory Services March 2026 Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s midwifery practice support and insurance credentialing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

Separate the clinical work from the equipment A speech-language pathologist can complete an excellent augmentative and alternative communication evaluation and still leave a family unsure who is obtaining the device. That confusion becomes a billing problem when the practice treats evaluation, equipment approval, delivery, and treatment as one event. ASHA identifies 92607 and 92608 with evaluation for a speech-generating device and 92609 with therapeutic services involving its use. These clinical services are distinct from the equipment codes. Use the current code descriptions and applicable time rules rather than putting every AAC appointment under the same code. [1] Assign responsibility for the device claim Medicare treats qualifying speech-generating devices as durable medical equipment. ASHA's Medicare guidance explains that equipment reimbursement goes through an appropriately enrolled DME supplier and describes documentation and ordering requirements. The SLP's professional enrollment does not, by itself, establish eligibility to bill for the equipment. [1] Before the evaluation, identify who will submit the professional claim, who will handle the equipment request, and where the family should direct questions about approval. Keep a record of what was sent and what remains outstanding. A device recommendation in your note does not tell the family whether the supplier received a complete packet. Keep treatment tied to communication needs Document the patient's functional communication needs, the systems considered, and the clinical reasoning behind the recommendation. For subsequent treatment, explain what the patient practiced and why skilled intervention was needed. Copying the equipment justification into every treatment note does not describe the treatment. Commercial plans and Medicaid programs may use different supplier networks, authorization processes, or documentation requirements. Confirm those rules for the actual plan instead of presenting the Medicare pathway as universal. The practical goal is simple: the family should leave knowing what clinical work occurred, what equipment step comes next, and who is responsible for it. An approved evaluation is not the same as an approved device. Sources [1] ASHA Medicare coverage policy on speech generating devices Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s speech-language pathology practice support and medical billing services to discuss the support your practice needs.

Bill the service time that occurred A calendar may reserve an hour for therapy. That does not establish an hour of psychotherapy. Late arrival, an early ending, or administrative interruptions can change the time that supports the claim. A Medicare contractor billing article lists 16 through 37 minutes for 90832, 38 through 52 minutes for 90834, and 53 minutes or more for 90837. The article is contractor guidance, not a promise of payment from every insurer. Apply the current code rules and the policy for the actual payer. [1] Make the record support the time Use a documentation method that reliably captures actual psychotherapy time. Distinguish the clinical service from scheduling, payment collection, or another service that has its own billing rules. Do not let the scheduling system automatically choose a code before the clinician has confirmed the work performed. For example, a patient scheduled for a longer visit may receive only 45 minutes of psychotherapy after arriving late. The reserved appointment length does not supply the missing minutes. Conversely, a clinically necessary longer session should be documented accurately, not shortened on the claim simply because the calendar used a standard slot. Time alone is not the whole record. The note should explain the treatment provided, its connection to the patient's needs, and the plan. A timestamp cannot substitute for clinical documentation. Review the workflow before the audit Check whether templates prefill a duration, whether the biller receives the actual time, and whether a clinician's correction reaches the claim before submission. A convenient default becomes a problem when nobody verifies it. Also distinguish standalone psychotherapy from psychotherapy furnished with an eligible prescriber's evaluation and management service. Counselors should not borrow a prescriber's coding structure because it appears on a payer's list. Patients do not need a lecture about coding thresholds at every visit. They do need a practice whose claims consistently describe the care they actually received. Sources [1] Medicare contractor billing article A56937 Practice support from Sunshyn Explore Sunshyn’s mental health counseling practice support and medical billing services to discuss the support your practice needs.